Norma McCorvey died yesterday (18th February) at the age of 69. This is a sad loss and at such an early age she still had much to contribute to the Pro-Life Movement. She had inside knowledge of the abortion industry and like most converts became more pro-life than cradle-pro-lifers. She was a born-again Christian who in due course converted to the Catholic Church. She had personally tried to overturn the US Supreme Court judgement – Roe v Wade – but was unsuccessful. The significance of this, as we know, is that she was the Jane Roe in that lawsuit. She did not get the same mainstream news media coverage under her given name, compared to the notoriety of her court name. Her pro-life views and efforts, although widely known by us, were largely ignored by the pro-abortion news media and suppressed by pro-abortion groups. Only now with her death are the real facts being given a higher profile in the news media, albeit with spin, and the truth reaching a wider audience. In her death she is still fighting the good fight.
Eternal rest grant unto her O Lord; and let perpetual light shine on her. May she rest in peace. Amen.
Please go to this more comprehensive obituary at > http://www.lifenews.com/2017/02/18/norma-mccorvey-jane-roe-of-roe-v-wade-passes-away-she-never-had-an-abortion-and-became-pro-life/
Then compare this with the BBC online news report at > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39016181
The original report was briefer and more in the style of an obituary. Within a short period of time it had been greatly expanded and included parts of previous reports pertaining to the abortion debate during the US Presidential election. The BBC will claim that this was to achieve balance and they were being impartial. However, obituaries do not have to be balanced. The BBC cannot miss any chance to air its pro-abortion agenda. Is this just a different perception or is it news media spin? On the face of it this report is balanced, but it is the subtle references that the ill-informed just accept as fact, when the truth is somewhat different.
The BBC report, “McCorvey first filed the case in 1969. She was pregnant with her third child and said she had been raped. But the case was rejected and she was forced to give birth.” In this example of spin, it is the statement ‘she was forced to give birth’. In fact she did not want an abortion in the first place. She did want a divorce, but was in a vulnerable position and was taken advantage of by an activist lawyer. She was not raped and not forced to give birth. As she later confirmed, this case was fabricated on the basis of lies. Since then more than 50 million babies have been aborted in the US. A crime against humanity, but that is not how the BBC sees it.
Post Script an additional comment and reflection on Norma > http://www.lifenews.com/2017/02/20/roe-v-wade-attorney-sarah-weddingtons-shocking-answer-when-asked-whatever-happened-to-roe/